Skip to main content
    Proof
    Impress Blinds — cost per enquiry down 62.63%, $23.6 to $8.82SLS Solicitors — cost per enquiry down 58.48%, $84.64 to $35.14FixCare Property — cost per enquiry down 56.36%, $35.24 to $15.38Rubbish Removal WA — cost per enquiry down 53.18%, $71.02 to $33.25Floral Cakery — cost per enquiry down 49.82%, $13.83 to $6.94ILLUMINATE Laser Emporium — cost per enquiry down 48.54%, $138.65 to $71.35Aussie Plumbing — cost per enquiry down 41.96%, $117.75 to $68.34Sydney Fence Painting — cost per enquiry down 33.68%, $136.62 to $90.61Alliance Plumbing — cost per enquiry down 29.6%, $81.26 to $57.21Gridless Build Solutions — cost per enquiry down 29.16%, $78.16 to $55.37FacilityWorx — cost per enquiry down 23.62%, $157.13 to $120.01Cornerstone Roofing — cost per enquiry down 20.47%, $41.71 to $33.17A council finance platform — 194 of 194 requirements metA council finance build — 14 weeks to UAT, −34% 10-yr costA cultural institution — $634K of $750K kept workingA council platform — $470,106 built vs $503,262 SaaSA federal agency — n=5,000 prevalence survey at ±1.4%A civic mural — 36 concepts for a 71m × 9m wallA regional shire — 32-page visitor guide, 3 weeks earlyA shire council — one platform retiring 8 of 9 vendorsA pressure washing business — 138 jobs at A$20.43 eachA pressure washing business — 21.20% conversion rateA carpet cleaner — 53 jobs in 15 days at A$24.92 eachA roofing company — 68 quote requests in 35 daysA CCTV installer — 39 qualified leads in 15 daysA fence painter — 36 jobs in 24 days, quotes by day 3A maintenance business — live in 8 weeks, 3 stacks gone41 numbered clauses, published in full5.0 across every Google review$120M+ in media under management250+ active engagements across five countries

    Marketing for growing companies You outgrew what got you here.

    One channel found you customers and you built the hiring plan on it. Now the cost per lead is climbing, sales is arguing about quality, and nobody can say which of five channels is actually producing revenue. That is not a media problem yet — it is a measurement problem wearing a media problem's clothes.

    A$120M+ in media under management · Clients from A$3,000 a month to multiple eight figures a month · Search, social, video, SEO and the tracking underneath

    The cracks

    Growth without
    structure gets expensive.

    Every one of these shows up as a budget conversation and none of them are budget problems. They are what happens when a business outgrows the way its marketing was built.

    • You tripled the spend and tripled the cost per lead

      Scaling is not spending more through the same structure. Past a point the structure itself is the ceiling, and adding budget just buys you the next-worst searches at the next-highest price.

    • More leads, worse leads

      Volume arrived and quality left. Sales is drowning in enquiries that never had a budget, and nobody noticed until the close rate had already moved.

    • One channel is carrying everything

      It works, which is exactly what makes it dangerous. A policy change, an auction shift or a competitor with deeper pockets, and the pipeline you have built the hiring plan on is suddenly a forecast.

    • You sound like everybody else

      The same ads, the same claims, the same three benefits as every competitor. When nothing separates the offers, the auction is decided on price, and you are the one who has to fund that.

    • Brand and performance are being argued, not planned

      The board wants awareness, sales wants leads, finance wants payback. All three are reasonable, and with no shared measurement the loudest one wins the quarter.

    • You cannot tell what is actually working

      Five channels, five dashboards, five different numbers for the same month. Attribution ends up being whichever platform reports most generously, which is the platform with the most to gain.

    • Your agency moves at agency speed

      A change takes a fortnight to schedule and another to ship. At this stage the cost of a slow decision is higher than the cost of a wrong one, because the wrong one at least produces data.

    Where are you?

    What works at two million does not work at ten.

    The bands below describe your situation, not a promise about ours. Find the one you are in — the priorities underneath it are what we would work on first, and in that order.

    1. Stage 01 · A$500K – A$2M

      Foundation

      Build the first channel

      You have found what people will pay for. What you do not yet have is a way to produce customers that does not depend on referrals, the founder's network, or luck.

      • High-intent search first — meeting demand that already exists
      • One landing page per service, written to answer one ad
      • Conversion tracking with values attached, before scaling anything
      • Remarketing to the people the first channel already reached
    2. Stage 02 · A$2M – A$10M

      Scaling

      Diversify before you have to

      Single-channel dependency is now the biggest risk on the register. The job is to add channels while keeping the cost per customer honest, which is a measurement problem before it is a media problem.

      • Multi-channel across search, social and video, budgeted against one target
      • Systematic creative testing rather than an occasional refresh
      • Lead scoring agreed with sales, so quality is measured not argued
      • CRM integration, so a closed deal can be traced back to a click
    3. Stage 03 · A$10M+

      Dominance

      Defend and expand

      You are a name in your market. Marketing now has two jobs at once: protect the positions producing revenue today, and find the next line of growth before the current one flattens.

      • Brand work funded alongside performance, not instead of it
      • Attribution across long, multi-touch cycles that finance will sign off
      • Market and product-line expansion, tested before it is committed to
      • Competitive intelligence — what they are bidding on, and what it costs them
    The work

    Ten things we do to make growth survivable.

    In this order, deliberately. Six of the ten happen before any new channel is switched on, because the most expensive way to scale is to add spend to a structure that cannot report on itself.

    1. Fix the measurement before adding a channel

      Every new channel makes attribution harder. Doing it in the other order means the second channel's results are unreadable, and the argument about which one deserves the budget becomes unwinnable for everybody.

    2. Define a qualified lead with the sales team in the room

      Not a form fill. A named set of conditions — budget, timing, decision-maker, fit — agreed with the people who have to ring them. Once that exists, lead quality is a number rather than an opinion.

    3. Push the winning structure to its actual ceiling

      Before adding anything, we find out what the channel that works can really produce: more searches, more geography, more of whatever is already converting. Most accounts stop expanding well before this point.

    4. Add the second channel for a reason you can name

      Reach, cost, timing or intent — one of the four, decided in advance. A channel added because it is popular is a budget line nobody can defend when the quarter tightens.

    5. Test creative on a schedule, not a whim

      New variations every month against the ads currently being served, testing one thing at a time — the promise, the proof, the format, the offer. The winners scale; the rest tell you what your market does not care about.

    6. Separate the campaigns that create demand from the ones that catch it

      Video and social create demand and are read over weeks. Search catches it and is read over days. Judged on the same report against the same window, one of them always looks like a failure and gets cut for the wrong reason.

    7. Connect the CRM so a closed deal points back at a click

      Offline conversion imports and consent-safe conversion APIs. Until a signed deal can be traced back to the campaign that produced it, bidding is optimising toward enquiries — and enquiries are not revenue.

    8. Move budget during the quarter, not after it

      Weekly reallocation between channels and campaigns based on what is producing customers now. Monthly reallocation means eleven months of the year are already committed before the data arrives.

    9. Rebuild the site around the funnel, not the org chart

      Growing companies usually have a site organised the way the business is organised. Paid traffic needs pages organised the way a buyer decides, which is rarely the same shape and is often the cheapest lift available.

    10. Report contribution, not activity

      Pipeline influence, cost per acquisition and channel contribution, in the format your leadership already reads. Impressions and engagement rate belong in the working file, not the board pack.

    Three real engagements

    Cornerstone Roofing · 35-day period

    68

    Quote requests

    Built for insurance work and storm-driven demand

    NexData · 15-day period

    39

    Qualified CCTV leads

    Qualification built into the campaign, not bolted on after

    Msaha · marketplace ops

    3 → 1

    Software tools consolidated

    One platform in production with an embedded ops assistant

    Figures are from live client engagements and are dated in each case study. They are what those programmes did, in those markets, at those budgets — not a forecast for yours.

    How an engagement runs

    From audit to a rhythm you can plan around.

    1. Week 1

      The growth audit

      Current channels, competitors, tracking and the market opportunity. We come back with where the money is leaking, where the ceiling actually is, and the quick wins that do not need a new budget.

    2. Week 2

      Strategy and architecture

      Channel plan, budget framework, KPI structure and creative direction — every dollar with a job. This is also where the definition of a qualified lead gets agreed with your sales team.

    3. Weeks 3–4

      Build across channels at once

      Campaigns, landing pages, creative, audiences and tracking, built in parallel rather than sequenced. A second person reviews all of it before anything is switched on.

    4. Day one

      You press go

      Everything is created paused so your team reads the whole build first. You activate when you are ready, not when we are.

    5. Months 2–3

      Optimise, then scale what earns it

      Daily optimisation, weekly creative tests, budget moved toward what is producing customers. Lead quality reviewed with sales rather than reported at them.

    6. Ongoing

      Attribution, forecasting and the quarterly

      Attribution modelling, revenue reporting and a proper quarterly conversation about the next growth phase — including what we would stop doing to fund it.

    SoudCoh Compound™

    Scaling is two of the six stages doing most of the work.

    Compound is how our team works on any account — six stages every change passes through. When several channels and several people are involved, these two are what keep it coherent.

    • Mandate

      You set the number before we spend the money.

      At this stage the number is not “more leads”. It is a target cost per acquisition, a volume you can actually service, and a payback window finance agrees with. Everything after this is arithmetic against those three, which is what makes scaling a decision rather than a hope.

    • Ledger

      Every change we make becomes a record you can open.

      Across five channels and several people, memory stops being reliable. Each change lands dated, named and attributed, so when a month moves the question “what did we do differently” has an answer rather than a theory.

    FAQ

    Growth questions.

    Cost, attribution, working alongside your team, creative at volume, and what happens when a channel stops earning its place.

    The first call is free and there is no deck.

    Talk to a strategist

    There is no single answer, because the shape of the work matters more than the revenue line. The smallest companies we work with invest a minimum of A$3,000 a month in ad spend, and our largest clients currently spend multiple eight figures a month across media and PPC. What decides which programme you get is the ladder on this page — whether you are building the first repeatable channel, adding the second and third, or defending a position you already hold.

    Ad spend and management fee are two separate numbers. Spend is set by what a customer is worth to you, how many you can service and how competitive the auction is — not by a percentage rule. Our fee scales with the work rather than with your media budget, which matters here because the expensive part of scaling is the measurement and creative work, not the button-pressing. The first call gives you a real number for your situation.

    Consistent UTM structures, server-side conversion APIs where the platforms support them, offline conversion imports from your CRM, and a model that shows influence across the whole funnel rather than crediting the last click. We report a blended cost per acquisition alongside per-channel numbers, because at this stage the per-channel figure alone will always tempt somebody to cut the channel that assists everything and closes nothing.

    Yes, and it is the most common arrangement at this size. We take the channels where specialist depth pays for itself and leave the ones your team already runs well, with an agreed split of who owns what. Where the goal is to build internal capability rather than replace it, we run that as an advisory and training engagement with a transition plan measured in months.

    Systematic testing rather than occasional refreshes: multiple variations each month, testing one variable at a time — the promise, the proof, the format, the offer — against what is currently being served. Winners are scaled and the losers are kept, because a list of what your market demonstrably does not respond to is worth as much as the winners and takes longer to rebuild.

    Paid search changes show within days because you are meeting demand that already exists. Restructuring an account that has grown organically usually takes four to six weeks to settle, and accounts find their best rhythm around 60 to 90 days. Channels that create demand rather than catch it — video, social, content — are read over months, which is why they are reported against a different window from the start.

    No long-term lock-in. We would rather keep the work because it is producing than because a document says you have to stay. What we ask for is enough runway to be fair to the work — a restructure judged in its second week is being judged mid-rebuild. The terms are put in front of you in plain English before anything is signed.

    We own and run the ad accounts, because the build is proprietary methodology refined across 250+ engagements — campaign architecture, negative-keyword libraries, audience stacks and conversion tracking. You get full-visibility reporting on performance and spend at all times, and on long-term agreements ownership and handover options are available to discuss.

    We say so, name the reason, and either restructure it or stop it. A channel that is not producing gets a defined window and a defined test, agreed in advance, so the decision to keep or kill it is made against something rather than in a meeting. If the honest answer is that a channel is wrong for your business, we would rather tell you than keep billing for it.

    A short weekly update on the numbers that move, a monthly deep-dive with what changed and why, and a quarterly strategy review with your leadership team. Everything is framed as pipeline, revenue and cost per acquisition rather than impressions and engagement rate. If a number moved the wrong way, you hear it from us first.

    Yes. Shopping campaigns, product feeds, e-commerce SEO and conversion work on the store itself are all in scope, and a growing store usually runs Shopping alongside Search rather than instead of it. The scaling logic on this page is the same either way — fix the measurement, push the working channel to its real ceiling, then add the next one for a reason you can name.

    The channels a scaling account adds next.

    Not all at once, and not in this order for everybody. Marketing for compares the three size segments side by side if you are not sure this is the right page for you.

    Further reading

    The two failures that show up first at this size are both data problems: what an untidy contact database costs in booked work and choosing the wrong CRM and living with it for three years. If you are not there yet, the small-business version is the stage below this one; if the constraint is the plan rather than the execution, growth advisory is where that conversation happens.

    Find the ceiling first

    We read your last ninety days across every channel, price the waste, and show you how much room is left in what already works before you fund anything new. Yours to keep either way.

    No pitch deck. No upsell. A real conversation and a written list of leaks.