Skip to main content
    Proof
    Impress Blinds — cost per recorded Google Ads conversion down 62.63%SLS Solicitors — cost per recorded Google Ads conversion down 58.48%FixCare Property — cost per enquiry down 56.36%Rubbish Removal WA — cost per enquiry down 53.18%Floral Cakery — cost per enquiry down 49.82%ILLUMINATE Laser Emporium — cost per enquiry down 48.54%Aussie Plumbing — cost per enquiry down 41.96%Sydney Fence Painting — cost per enquiry down 33.68%Alliance Plumbing — cost per enquiry down 29.6%Gridless Build Solutions — cost per enquiry down 29.16%FacilityWorx — cost per enquiry down 23.62%Cornerstone Roofing — cost per enquiry down 20.47%Council finance — budgeting and workforce designCouncil planning — clearer approvals and reportingCultural audiences — media strategy and creative conceptsCommunity participation — surveys, maps and project pagesPublic-sector research — survey design and analysisPublic art — site studies and visual conceptsRegional identity — visitor guides and wayfinding conceptsCouncil systems — integration and migration planningA pressure washing business — service-led search campaignsA pressure washing business — a clear enquiry journeyA carpet cleaner — Google Ads built around cleaning servicesA roofing company — campaigns for repairs and restorationA CCTV installer — campaigns for security enquiriesA fence painter — search campaigns for specific surfacesA maintenance business — live in 8 weeks, 3 stacks gone41 numbered clauses, published in full5.0 across every Google review$120M+ in media under management250+ active engagements across five countries
    Government & Public Sector

    Keep a multi-partner programme moving

    A programme delivered by several partners needs more than a calendar of meetings. Each group may produce useful work while the programme as a whole struggles to share findings or resolve decisions. Coordination creates a common working rhythm without pretending every partner has the same local needs.

    • 23 September 2026
    • 3 min read
    Programme coordination and stakeholder adoption: define the question, then explore the evidence, then make it understandable.
    An example approach for a programme delivered by several regional partners.

    Agree what the programme must produce

    Begin with the outputs, the people who need them and the decisions they support. Clarify which work belongs to each partner and which work needs coordination across the programme. An unclear division of responsibility can produce both duplicated effort and overlooked tasks.

    For a regional programme, local teams may gather information in different settings while the programme lead needs a consistent view of progress. Agree the common questions early. Keep room for local explanation so a standard reporting format does not erase the differences that matter.

    Use a meeting rhythm tied to decisions

    Give each meeting a purpose. A working session might resolve a delivery problem; a programme review might confirm priorities or examine progress against agreed outputs. Share the relevant information before the meeting and record the decision afterwards.

    Maintain a short action record with an owner and a clear next step. Review unresolved items rather than repeatedly describing them. Coordination becomes useful when a participant can see what changed because people met, what they now need to do and where an issue still requires a decision.

    A practical guide

    Make the next shared action visible

    • Partners describe progress differently

      Agree a small shared reporting format

      Use common questions while leaving room for each partner's setting and work.

    • A decision or action is outstanding

      Name an owner and the next review

      Keep open decisions and dependencies visible in the shared action record.

    • Findings are ready for wider use

      Prepare practical resources and training

      Have the relevant specialists review the material before others are asked to use it.

    Turn information into shared knowledge

    Different reports can be difficult to compare even when they describe related work. Agree simple definitions and submission formats for the information the programme genuinely needs. Check incoming material and resolve gaps with the originating team.

    Build a knowledge library around how people will use it. Organise reviewed findings, practical resources and current guidance so another partner can find and understand them. A large folder of documents is not automatically a shared learning resource. Each important item needs enough context to explain what it is useful for.

    Plan how people will adopt the work

    Publishing a resource is only one part of helping others use it. Consider who needs a briefing, a workshop, a practical example or support to apply the findings in their setting. Match the format to the work those people are expected to do.

    Specialist functions remain with qualified partners. Scientific advice, clinical decisions, safeguarding and technical assessment need the appropriate expertise. A coordination team can arrange contributions and maintain the programme record, but should not replace the professional judgement that makes those contributions reliable.

    Evaluate the programme without overclaiming

    Agree a baseline and a reasonable set of progress questions. Distinguish activities completed from changes in practice and from longer-term outcomes. A workshop attendance count shows participation; it does not by itself demonstrate adoption.

    The useful outputs are a programme plan, shared templates, a working action record, communication resources and an evaluation framework. Review them with the partners during delivery. When circumstances change, update the plan and explain the effect on priorities instead of letting the original document become disconnected from the actual programme.

    Explore our Programme coordination and stakeholder adoption, related services and Turn a service review into a practical improvement plan.

    What to do next

    Talk to SoudCoh about the service question, the people involved and the outputs your team needs.
    Talk to SoudCoh
    Read next

    Filed under the same desk first. The full index is searchable and filters by reader.

    If you would rather we just did it.

    The briefing above is the reasoning. These are the pages that describe what it looks like as a piece of paid work, including what it costs and what gets reported.

    Apply it to your account

    Reading it is the easy half. Thirty minutes with someone who runs accounts and you leave with a written list of what is leaking on yours — yours to keep either way.

    No pitch deck. No upsell. A real conversation and a written list of leaks.