Choose what the learner should be able to do
Start with the work or decision the activity is meant to explain. A careers programme might help someone understand how a role approaches a problem. Staff learning might help a person recognise when to ask for advice or which information is needed before acting.
Write a small set of observable learning aims. “Understand the process” is difficult to design or test. “Identify the missing information and choose the appropriate next step” gives the team a concrete activity to build and a clearer way to review whether it works.
Create a situation with meaningful choices
Use a fictional scenario that reflects the type of work without exposing real personal or operational information. Give the learner enough context to make a choice and show a consequence that helps explain it.
The scenario does not need a complicated game system. A short sequence of decisions can be effective when each one advances the learning aim. Avoid choices that merely test whether someone spotted the obviously correct answer. Include the uncertainty or competing considerations that make the real work worth understanding.
Write the feedback as carefully as the task
Feedback should explain why an action matters and what the learner can take from it. A score alone rarely explains the reasoning. A debrief can connect the scenario with the wider role, show alternative approaches and identify where professional judgement is required.
Ask subject-matter experts to review the situation, choices and explanation together. A plausible-looking simulation can teach the wrong lesson if the consequences are unrealistic. Their review should happen while the design can still change, rather than after the activity has been fully produced.
Design the experience for the intended learners
Consider reading load, device use, timing and the ways people interact with the activity. Important information should remain available long enough to understand. A learner should know how to pause, get help and return to the task where appropriate.
Test a prototype with representative users. Observe where instructions are unclear or where the interface distracts from the learning aim. If the programme includes results or certificates, explain that journey separately: who issues them, how learners access them and what happens when an error needs correction.
Keep learning and formal recognition distinct
A completed activity does not automatically establish a qualification or professional competence. The authorised organisation decides what a formal result means and how it may be issued, corrected or shared. Software can support that process with appropriate information and document journeys.
The project outputs can include a learning brief, scenario scripts, an interactive prototype, testing findings and support material. For a larger programme, build a small complete activity first. Its review can reveal whether the teaching approach and interface deserve further development before the whole course is produced.
Explore our Online learning, simulations and digital credentials, related services and Turn one public-service brief into useful content.